Start with one workflow you no longer trust. If it qualifies, you get a one-page verdict: what drifted, the likely cause, and the estimated impact when your inputs support one.
Free — nothing is charged for any of this. No calls, no logins, no client files. Everything in writing.
Synthetic example. Method: available baseline, outcome criteria, volume and rate, with uncertainty shown. Every assumption stays in the trail.
The available evidence supports keeping the workflow as it is.
The degradation appears local and recoverable. Fix the weak step before replacing the workflow.
The current evidence does not justify continuing without a material change.
A few lines in writing: what it does, what changed, and what a good result used to look like. No logs, exports, or credentials.
Qualification checks whether a safe review is possible on what is available. A no comes with the reason and costs you nothing.
Keep, retrain, or stop, with the evidence, the assumptions, and the number or an explicit impact unavailable. You decide what happens next.
Four rough inputs, worked out in your browser with the same method the review uses. It stays an estimate: no logs, no files, nothing leaves this page, and it is not the keep, retrain, or stop verdict.
Pick a stretch when the workflow was still trusted. Out of every 100 runs, how many came back usable without a human redoing them? A rough count from memory or a spot check is enough — the review refines it later.
92 of 100 runs were usable → enter 92
How often the workflow returned a good result when it was healthy.
Same count for the last week or two, after you started distrusting it. If you have not counted, sample 20 recent runs and scale up.
79 of 100 usable now → enter 79
How often it succeeds now, after the suspected drift.
How many times this workflow runs in a month, across all clients on it. Zapier and Make show this in task history; n8n shows it in executions.
5,000 runs per month → enter 5000
Runs, tickets, or messages this workflow handles per month.
What one bad output costs you to catch and redo: minutes spent times your hourly rate. Count the checking, not just the fixing.
10 minutes at $48/hour → about 8
Rough dollar cost of catching and reworking a single bad output.
Estimate from your own rough inputs, not a verdict or advice. The real keep, retrain, or stop decision comes from a qualified, export-first review with the evidence attached.
See if this workflow qualifies for a verdict, at no chargeNo team page, no logo wall, no sales call. The review is run by the person who built the method, one case at a time, which is also the honest limit of this offer at its current stage.
A one-page review of one qualified workflow: keep, retrain, or stop, the evidence behind it, and a likely cause. Dollar impact is included only when the inputs support it.
Nothing. There is no paid tier, no invoice, and no payment method on this site — not for the first review and not for the ones after it. If paid work is ever offered, scope and terms would be agreed in writing beforehand. Monitoring, alerts, and monthly plans are not part of the current offer.
Only a qualification request. Do not paste or upload client logs, files, credentials, payment data, or personal information. A safe data path must be agreed separately before analysis.
No live access is required to qualify a case. Any later review is export-first and remains separate from the client system.
Zapier, Make, n8n, and LLM workflow exports are assessed case by case. This is a manual-first review, not a claim of native integration with every tool.
From the available baseline, outcome criteria, volume, rate, and an explicit uncertainty discount. If those inputs are weak, the report shows a range or marks impact unavailable.
Timing is confirmed after qualification and a review of the available inputs. There is no unconditional turnaround promise at this stage.
The artifact is structured for a client conversation. Exact branding and format are confirmed before the review starts.
Qualified reviews are provided at no charge. Qualification confirms the workflow, decision trigger, available baseline, and whether a safe review is possible. It does not collect client files.
Free. No calls, no logins, nothing to install. If the workflow does not qualify, you get the reason instead of an invoice.
No-file intake
Submit only contact details and a high-level incident category. Do not submit logs, exports, credentials, payment data, client content, or personal information. Read the privacy boundary.